Food packaging from recycled materials must be safe
Ninth BfR Forum on Consumer Protection deals with health risks of recycled packaging materials
From the harvesting and/or production of foods to the consumption of the product hours or months and in some cases even years can pass. In order to store, transport and protect foods from decay, they are packaged. Food packages underwent major changes during the past decades. If one purchased milk for instance 50 years ago, it was still necessary to bring a milk can made of glass or metal along; today one buys as a rule a composite carton which is recycled after the consumption of the milk.
Food packages are governed by requirements under food law. No undesired substances may migrate from the packaging into the food so that neither the quality of the food nor the health of consumers is impaired. In order to save resources and prevent waste, food packages are partly made of recycled materials. Whilst the recycling of plastics is comparatively well regulated, unknown compounds appear time and again in the field of carton packages made of recycled paper.
The most recent case involves mineral residues in cardboard packages for foods. They originate from the printing inks of newspapers used for the production of the recycling cardboard. According to analyses by a Swiss laboratory, residues migrate in relevant quantities into the foods in the cartons. This concerns dry foods with a large surface such as rice, semolina, corn flakes and noodles. A final assessment of the residues is not yet possible because of the highly complex mixtures involved, and the current data situation is not yet sufficient for all of them. However, for certain parts of the mixtures there are data from animal tests. They suggest that they are deposited in the liver and lymph nodes and could damage these organs. For another part of these mixtures, the aromatics fraction, there is, however, still a lack of fundamental data and, more particularly, studies on whether they can cause cancer in animals when taken up in food. According to BfR, the migration of mineral oils into foods should, therefore, be minimised.
As a possibility, the BfR Forum discussed the use of liner bags, for example made of aluminium coated plastics, in carton packages, which could act as a barrier to the migration of mineral oils. Appropriate plastics materials are known. Another possible solution could be impervious paper coatings. The waiver of mineral oil containing printing inks in newspaper printing was likewise discussed. This would have the additional advantage that a migration of mineral oils via the skin into the body when reading a newspaper could be prevented. The use of fresh fibres for the production of cardboard packages for foods was assessed as a possible solution under consumer protection aspects but from an ecological perspective this alternative was criticised.
Topics
Organizations
Other news from the department politics & laws
These products might interest you
Gilson MyPIPETMAN Select and MyPIPETMAN Enterprise Pipettes by Gilson
Grab the Gilson pipettes with your name and favorite colors!
Customise Your Pipettes to Fit Your Research
Systec H-Series by Systec
Safe, reproducible and validatable sterilization of liquids, solids and waste
Autoclaves with 65-1580 liters usable space, flexibly expandable for various applications
Whatman™ folded filter papers by Cytiva
Whatman folded filter papers
Convenient folded formats speed up your sample preparation
Get the chemical industry in your inbox
From now on, don't miss a thing: Our newsletter for the chemical industry, analytics, lab technology and process engineering brings you up to date every Tuesday and Thursday. The latest industry news, product highlights and innovations - compact and easy to understand in your inbox. Researched by us so you don't have to.