Sulfur lamp

  The sulfur lamp (also sulphur lamp) is a highly efficient full-spectrum electrodeless lighting system whose light is generated by sulfur plasma that has been excited by microwave radiation. The technology was developed in the early 1990s, but, although it appeared initially to be very promising, sulfur lighting was a commercial failure by the late 1990s. Since 2005, lamps are again being manufactured for commercial use.

Additional recommended knowledge

How to quickly check pipettes?

Essential Laboratory Skills Guide

How to ensure accurate weighing results every day?

Mechanism

The sulfur lamp consists of a golf ball-sized (30mm) fused-quartz bulb containing several milligrams of sulfur powder and argon gas at the end of a thin glass spindle. The bulb is enclosed in a microwave-resonant wire-mesh cage. A magnetron, much like the ones in home microwave ovens, bombards the bulb, via a waveguide, with 2.45 GHz microwaves. The microwave energy excites the gas to five atmospheres pressure, which in turn heats the sulfur to an extreme degree forming a brightly glowing plasma capable of illuminating a large area. Because the bulb heats up considerably, it is necessary for an electric motor to spin the bulb while a fan cools it to prevent it from melting. The bulb is usually placed at the focus of a parabolic reflector to direct all the light in one direction.

It would be impossible to excite the sulfur using traditional electrodes; the sulfur would quickly react with all metallic electrodes rendering them useless. The absence of electrodes allows for a much greater variety of light-generating substances to be used than those used in traditional lamps.

The design life of the bulb is approximately 60,000 hours. However, the design life of magnetrons is currently only about 15,000 to 20,000 hours.

With the exception of fluorescent lamps, the warm-up time of the sulfur lamp is notably shorter than for other gas discharge lamps, even at low ambient temperatures. It reaches 80% of its final luminous flux within twenty seconds (video), and the lamp can be restarted approximately five minutes after a power cut.

The first prototype lamps were 5.9 kW units, with a system efficiency of 80 lumens per watt. The first production models were 1.4 kW with an output of 135,000 lumens. Later models were able to eliminate the cooling fan^[1] and improve efficiency to more than 100 lumens/watt.

Quality of emitted light

The sulfur plasma consists mainly of dimer molecules (S₂), which generate the light through molecular emission. Because this, instead of atomic emission, is the mechanism of light generation, the emission spectrum is continuous throughout the visible spectrum. The lamp's output is low in infrared energy, and less than 1% is ultraviolet light. As much as 73% of the emitted radiation is in the visible spectrum, far more than other types of lamps. The visible light output mimics sunlight better than any other artificial light source, and the lack of harmful ultraviolet radiation is an extra benefit.

The spectral output peaks at 510 nanometres, imparting a distinctly greenish hue to the illuminated environment. The correlated color temperature is approximately 6000 kelvins with a CRI of 79. The lamp can be dimmed to 15% without affecting the light quality, and light output remains constant over the life of the bulb.

The use of a magenta filter can be used to give the light a warmer feel. Such a filter was used on the lamps at the National Air and Space Museum in Washington, D.C.^[2]

The addition of other chemicals in the bulb might improve color rendition. Sulfur lamp bulbs with calcium bromide (CaBr₂) added produce a similar spectrum with the addition of a spike in red wavelengths at 625nm.^[3] Other additives such as lithium iodide (LiI) and sodium iodide (NaI) can be used to modify the output spectra.^{[4] [5] [6]}

History

The technology was conceived by engineer Michael Ury, physicist Charles Wood and their colleagues in 1990. With support from the United States Department of Energy, it was further developed in 1994 by Fusion Lighting of Rockville, Maryland, a spinoff of the Fusion UV division of Fusion Systems Corporation. Its origins are in microwave discharge light sources used for ultraviolet curing in the semiconductor and printing industries. The Fusion UV division was later sold to Spectris plc, and the rest of Fusion Systems was later acquired by the Eaton Corporation.

Only two production models were developed, both with similar specifications: the Solar 1000 in 1994 and the Light Drive 1000 in 1997, which was a refinement of the previous model.

Production of these lamps ended in 1998.^[7] Fusion Lighting closed its doors in early 2002, after having used up approximately $90 million in venture capital. Their patents were licensed to the LG Group. The Internet Archive has a copy of Fusion Lighting's defunct website. Their lamps were installed in more than one hundred facilities worldwide, but many of them have already been removed.

In 2001, Ningbo Youhe New Lighting Source Co., Ltd, in Ningbo, China, produced its own sulfur lamp version. The company's website is no longer online and may be out of business, but information on these lamps is available from its archived copy at the Internet Archive.

Since 2005, sulfur lamps have been marketed by Sulphur Plasma Lighting in Sliedrecht, the Netherlands. While these lamps are an original design, their specifications and output are similar to the production models previously manufactured by Fusion Lighting.

In 2006, LG Electronics began production of its sulfur lamps, called Plasma Lighting System (PLS).

Electromagnetic interference

The magnetrons in these lamps may very well cause interruption in 2.4 GHz wireless spectrum, which is used by Wi-Fi, cordless phones and satellite radio in North America. Fearing interference with their broadcasts, Sirius and XM satellite radio petitioned the United States Federal Communications Commission (FCC) to force Fusion Lighting to reduce by 99.9% the electromagnetic emissions of sulfur lamps. In 2001, Fusion Lighting agreed to install metal shielding around their lamps reducing electromagnetic emissions by 95%.

In May 2003, the FCC adopted an order terminating a proceeding started in 1998 that would have defined out-of-band emission limits for radio-frequency lights operating at 2.45 GHz, saying the record of the proceeding had become outdated and Fusion Lighting, the only party that had expressed an interest in 2.45 GHz RF lighting, had stopped pursuing development of RF lighting in that band.^[8] The order concluded:

"We therefore decline to provide the requested relief from the Satellite Radio Licensees to prohibit operation of all RF lights in the 2.45 GHz band, as we find that the requested prohibition is overarching and is not warranted based on the circumstances. If there is evidence that any entity will seek to operate RF lights in the 2.45 GHz band and cause harmful interference to satellite radio receivers as a consequence, and our existing limits prove inadequate, we will at that time take appropriate action."

Environmental issues

Unlike fluorescent and high-intensity discharge lamps, sulfur lamps contain no mercury. Therefore, sulfur lamps do not pose a threat to the environment or require special disposal. In addition, use of sulfur lamps has the potential to reduce the total amount of energy required for lighting.

Light distribution systems

Because the amount of light produced from one bulb is so great, it is usually necessary to distribute the light to areas far removed from the lamp. The most common method used is light pipes.

Light pipes

The 3M light pipe (also called a light guide or light tube) is a long, transparent, hollow cylinder with a prismatic surface developed by 3M that distributes the light uniformly over its length.^[9] Light pipes can be as long as 40 metres and are assembled on site from shorter, modular units. The light pipe is attached to the parabolic reflector of the sulfur lamp. For shorter pipes, there will be a mirror at the opposite end; for longer ones, there will be a lamp at each end. The overall appearance of a light pipe has been compared to that of a giant-sized fluorescent tube. One sulfur lamp with a light pipe can replace dozens of HID lamps. In the National Air and Space Museum, three lamps, each with a 27-metre pipe, replaced 94 HID lamps while greatly increasing the amount of light delivered.^[10]

The greatly reduced number of lamps may simplify maintenance and reduce installation costs but may also require a backup system for areas where lighting is critical.

The light pipes allow the lamp to be placed in an easily accessible area for maintenance and away from places where the heat of the lamp may be a problem.

Secondary reflectors

A secondary reflector is a structure with a mirrored surface placed directly into the path of the beam of light as it exits the parabolic primary reflector of the lamp. A secondary reflector can have a complex geometry which allows it to break up the light and direct it to where it is desired. It can spotlight an object or spread out the light for general illumination.

At Sundsvall-Härnösand Airport near Sundsvall, Sweden, airfield lighting is provided by sulfur lamps mounted on towers 30 metres tall. The lamps are directed upward and shine their light onto wing-shaped secondary reflectors that spread the light out and direct it downward. In this way, one lamp can illuminate an area 30 by 80 metres.

At the headquarters of DONG Energy, an energy company in Denmark, a single sulfur lamp directs its light onto numerous specular reflectors and diffusers to illuminate the entrance hall as well as several sculptures outside of the building.

At the entrance to University Hospital in Lund, Sweden, secondary reflectors on the ceiling are clad with highly reflective films, but shaped so as to avoid any glare. Moreover, since these films have a microprismatic surface structure that splits up the beams, the risk of glare problems is further reduced. The fact that the reflectors move the light source far away from the eye of anyone who would happen to look into them helps to further eliminate glare problems.^[11]

Indirect lighting

Indirect fixtures direct most of their luminous flux upward toward a ceiling. A highly reflective ceiling can then serve as a secondary source of diffusive, low luminance, high visual quality lighting for interior spaces. The primary advantages of indirect lighting are the opportunity to significantly reduce indirect glare potential and to completely eliminate direct source viewing.^[12]

At the Sacramento Municipal Utility District (SMUD) headquarters building, two sulfur lamps were installed in the tops of free-standing kiosks. The 4.2m high ceiling was retrofit with high reflectance (90%), white acoustic ceiling tile. The lamps direct their light upward, and it is reflected off the ceiling providing indirect light. Narrow, medium, or wide beam patterns can be created by choosing various reflector elements.^[13]

Direct lighting

  Light pipes would not be necessary in applications such as stadium lighting, where a plain fixture can be mounted high enough so that the light can spread over a large area. The installation at Hill Air Force Base contains lamps with light pipes as well as downlight fixtures mounted high in an aircraft hangar.

Optical fibers

Optical fibers have been studied as a distribution system for sulfur lamps, but no practical system has ever been marketed.^[14]

Future prospects

In 2005, Sulphur Plasma Lighting in Sliedrecht- the Netherlands and Sulphur Plasma Lighting in Essex-England began marketing a sulfur lamp. They have recently begun full production. Research into the technology continues at several universities. In addition, several companies in Europe and Asia are attempting to bring a practical sulfur lamp to the market. The U. S. Department of Energy is no longer funding any research into the technology.

The development of an affordable, efficient, and long-lived microwave source is a technological hurdle to cost reduction and commercial success. The lamp prototypes were only available in high wattages (1000+ W), which impeded adoption in applications where light output demands were not great. The sulfur lamp has problems with the life of the magnetron and the motor that rotates the bulb and noise from the cooling fan. Because the lamp has moving parts, reliability remains a critical issue, and system maintenance may impede market adoption.

Researchers have had some success at eliminating the need to rotate the bulb by using circularly polarized microwaves to spin the plasma instead.^{[15] [16]} Other experiments have used sodium iodide, scandium iodide, indium monobromide (InBr),^[17][18] selenium (photo), or tellurium^[19] as the light-generating medium.

Prominent installations

Main article: List of sulfur lamp installations

  Many of the installations of the lamps were for testing purposes only, but there remain a few sites where the lamps are in use as the primary lighting source. Perhaps the most visible of these would be the glass atria in the National Air and Space Museum.

See also

• Electrodeless lamp
• List of light sources
• Timeline of lighting technology

Notes

• General information
  • Sulphur lamp information
  • "Lighting a Revolution: Lee Anderson and Michael Ury"
  • Various notes on the sulfur lamp
  • "Sun on Earth", International Association for Energy-Efficient Lighting Newsletter, March 1994
  • Radio frequency lamps overview
  • Information on light pipes

• Technical papers
  • Transport and equilibrium in molecular plasmas: the sulfur lamp
  • General treatment of the interplay between fluid and radiative transport phenomena in symmetric plasmas: the sulphur lamp as a case study
  • Investigation of the IR Radiation Losses in Microwave Operated Sulfur Lamps
  • Environmental Friendly High Efficient Light Source
  • Spectral Properties of Microwave-powered Sulfur Lamps in Comparison to Sunlight and High Pressure Sodium/Metal Halide Lamps
  • The electrodeless discharge lamp: a prospective tool for photochemistry
  • Sulfur Light Sources with Minimal Microwave Power
  • Courret, Gilles, Environmental Friendly High Efficient Light Source, La Haute École d'Ingénierie et de Gestion du Canton de Vaud
  • Environmental Friendly High Efficient Light Source

• Images
  • Installed LG Electronic's PLS
  • Photos of installed sulfur lamps
  • Info on sulfur lamps from Helsinki University of Technology
  • Videos of sulfur lamps
  • More videos of sulfur lamps
  • Video of the starting cycle of a sulfur lamp
  • Photos of sulfur lamps

• Radio interference
  • "RF Lighting: A Potential 'Extinction Level Event' For Communications Users Of The 2.4 GHz Band"
  • "Unintended Consequences of High-Efficiency Lighting"
  • "FCC Rejects Satellite Radio's Petition to Ban RF Lights in 2.45 GHz Band"
  • Letter to Secretary of FCC on 3rd Proposal to Fusion Lighting

• Criticism
  • Criticism of sulfur lamps at Slashdot
  • First-hand experience with sulfur lamps at Slashdot
  • More first-hand experience with sulfur lamps at Slashdot

Offline sources

• Suplee, Curt, "Energy Dept. Brings Dazzling Bulb to Light", The Washington Post, October 21, 1994
• Suplee, Curt, "A New Kind of Illumination That Burns Brightly, but Not Out", The Washington Post, October 24, 1994
• Holusha, John, "Light Source To Replace Many Bulbs", The New York Times, October 26, 1994
• "Sulfur Lighting on Track", Environmental Building News, July 1995
• Schroeder, Michael, and Dreazen, Yochi, "Energy-Saving Light Bulbs Mar Satellite Radio", The Wall Street Journal, August 6, 2001
• "Sulfur Lighting No Longer on Track", Environmental Building News, August 2005