My watch list

HSAB theory

The HSAB concept is an acronym for 'hard and soft acids and bases'. Also known as the Pearson acid base concept, HSAB is widely used in chemistry for explaining stability of compounds, reaction mechanisms and pathways. It assigns the terms 'hard' or 'soft', and 'acid' or 'base' to chemical species. 'Hard' applies to species which are small, have high charge states (the charge criterion applies mainly to acids, to a lesser extent to bases), and are weakly polarizable. 'Soft' applies to species which are big, have low charge states and are strongly polarizable.^[1]

The theory is used in contexts where a qualitative, rather than quantitative description would help in understanding the predominant factors which drive chemical properties and reactions. This is especially so in transition metal chemistry, where numerous experiments have been done to determine the relative ordering of ligands and transition metal ions in terms of their hardness and softness.

HSAB theory is also useful in predicting the products of metathesis reactions. Quite recently it has been shown that even the sensitivity and performance of explosive materials can be explained on basis of HSAB theory ^[2]

Ralph Pearson introduced the HSAB principle in the early 1960s^[3]^[4] as an attempt to unify inorganic and organic reaction chemistry.^[5].

Additional recommended knowledge

How to ensure accurate weighing results every day?

Correct Test Weight Handling Guide: 12 Practical Tips

Theory

The gist of this theory is that soft acids react faster and form stronger bonds with soft bases, whereas hard acids react faster and form stronger bonds with hard bases, all other factors being equal.^[6] The classification in the original work was mostly based on equilibrium constants for reaction of two Lewis bases competing for a Lewis acid.

Hard acids and hard bases tend to have:

small size
high oxidation state
low polarizability
high electronegativity
energy low-lying HOMO (bases) or energy high-lying LUMO (acids).^[6]

Examples of hard acids are: H⁺, alkali ions, Ti⁴⁺, Cr³⁺, Cr⁶⁺, BF₃. Examples of hard bases are: OH^–, F^–, Cl^–, NH₃, CH₃COO^–, CO₃^2–. The affinity of hard acids and hard bases for each other is mainly ionic in nature.

Soft acids and soft bases tend to have:

large size
low or zero oxidation state
high polarizability
low electronegativity
energy high-lying HOMO (bases) and energy-low lying LUMO (acids).^[6]

Examples of soft acids are: CH₃Hg⁺, Pt⁴⁺, Pd²⁺, Ag⁺, Au⁺, Hg²⁺, Hg₂²⁺, Cd²⁺, BH₃. Examples of soft bases are: H^–, R₃P, SCN^–, I^–. The affinity of soft acids and bases for each other is mainly covalent in nature.

Acids				Bases
hard		soft		hard		soft
Hydronium	H⁺	Mercury	CH₃Hg⁺, Hg²⁺, Hg₂²⁺	Hydroxyl	OH^-	Hydride	H^-
Alkali metals	Li⁺,Na⁺,K⁺	Platinum	Pt⁴⁺	Alkoxide	RO^-	Thiolate	RS^-
Titanium	Ti⁴⁺	Palladium	Pd²⁺	Halogens	F^-,Cl^-	Halogens	I^-
Chromium	Cr³⁺,Cr⁶⁺	Silver	Ag⁺	Ammonia	NH₃	Phosphine	PR₃
Boron trifluoride	BF₃	borane	BH₃	Carboxylate	CH₃COO^-	Thiocyanate	SCN^-
Carbocation	R₃C⁺	P-chloranil		Carbonate	CO₃^2-	carbon monoxide	CO
		bulk Metals	M⁰	Hydrazine	N₂H₄	Benzene	C₆H₆
		Gold	Au⁺
Table 1. Hard and soft acids and bases

Borderline cases are also identified: borderline acids are trimethylborane, sulfur dioxide and ferrous Fe²⁺, cobalt Co²⁺ and lead Pb²⁺ cations. Borderline bases are: aniline, pyridine, nitrogen N₂ and the azide, bromine, nitrate and sulphate anions.

Generally speaking, acids and bases interact and the most stable interactions are hard-hard (ionogenic character) and soft-soft (covalent character).

An attempt to quantify the 'softness' of a base consists in determining the equilibrium constant for the following equilibrium:

BH + CH₃Hg⁺ ↔ H⁺ + CH₃HgB

Where CH₃Hg⁺ (methylmercury ion) is a very soft acid and H⁺ (proton) is a hard acid, which compete for B (the base to be classified).

Some examples illustrating the effectiveness of the theory:

Bulk metals are soft acids and are poisoned by soft bases such as phosphines and sulfides.
Hard solvents such as hydrogen fluoride, water and the protic solvents tend to solvatate strong solute bases such as the fluorine anion and the oxygen anions. On the other hand dipolar aprotic solvents such as dimethyl sulfoxide and acetone are soft solvents with a preference for solvatating large anions and soft bases.
In coordination chemistry soft-soft and hard-hard interactions exist between ligands and metal centers.

Chemical hardness

Chemical hardness
Acids			Bases
Hydrogen	H⁺	infinite	Fluoride	F^-	7
Aluminum	Al³⁺	45.8	Ammonia	NH₃	6.8
Lithium	Li⁺	35.1	hydride	H^-	6.8
Scandium	Sc³⁺	24.6	carbon monoxide	CO	6.0
Sodium	Na⁺	21.1	hydroxyl	OH^-	5.6
Lanthanum	La³⁺	15.4	cyanide	CN^-	5.3
Zinc	Zn²⁺	10.8	phosphane	PH₃	5.0
Carbon dioxide	CO₂	10.8	nitrite	NO₂^-	4.5
Sulfur dioxide	SO₂	5.6	Hydrosulfide	SH^-	4.1
Iodine	I₂	3.4	Methane	CH₃^-	4.0
Table 2. Chemical hardness data

In 1983 Pearson together with Robert Parr extended the qualitative HSAB theory with quantitative chemical hardness (η) defined as ^[7]:

$\eta = 0.5(I - A) \,$

with $I\,$ the ionization potential and $A\,$ the electron affinity.

When the electronegativity (χ) as the Mulliken scale:

$\chi = 0.5(I + A) \,$

is the first derivative in a plot of energy $E\,$ versus the amount of electrons $N\,$ with fixed nuclear charge $Z\,$ in an atom or molecule:

$\chi = \left(\frac{\partial E}{\partial N}\right)_Z \,$

then the chemical hardness is simply the second derivative:

$\eta = 0.5\left(\frac{\partial^2 E}{\partial N^2}\right)_Z \,$

Hardness and electronegativity are related as:

$2\eta = -\left(\frac{\partial \chi}{\partial N}\right)_Z \,$

and in this sense hardness is a measure for resistance to deformation or change. Likewise a value of zero denotes maximum softness.

In a compilation of hardness values only that of the hydride anion deviates. Another discrepancy noted in the original 1983 article are the apparent higher hardness of Tl³⁺ compared to Tl⁺.

Kornblum's rule

An application of HSAB theory is the so-called Kornblum's rule which states that in reactions with ambident nucleophiles, the more electronegative atom reacts when the reaction mechanism is S_N1 and the less electronegative one in a S_N2 reaction. This rule (established in 1954) ^[8] actually predates HSAB theory but in HSAB terms its explanation is that in a S_N1 reaction the carbocation (a hard acid) reacts with a hard base (high electronegativity) and that in a S_N2 reaction tetravalent carbon (a soft acid) reacts with ditto soft bases.

References

^ Jolly, W. L.. Modern Inorganic Chemistry. ISBN 0070327602.
^ [1]E.-C. Koch, Acid-Base Interactions in Energetic Materials: I. The Hard and Soft Acids and Bases (HSAB) Principle-Insights to Reactivity and Sensitivity of Energetic Materials, Prop.,Expl.,Pyrotech. 30 2005, 5
^ Pearson, Ralph G. (1963). "Hard and Soft Acids and Bases". J. Am. Chem. Soc. 85 (22): 3533 - 3539. doi:10.1021/ja00905a001.
^ Pearson, Ralph G.. "Hard and soft acids and bases, HSAB" (subscriber access). J. Chem. Educ. 1968 (45): 581643.
^ [2]R. G. Pearson, Chemical Hardness - Applications From Molecules to Solids, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 1997, 198 pp
^ ^a ^b ^c IUPAC, Glossary of terms used in theoretical organic chemistry, accessed 16 Dec 2006.
^ Robert G. Parr and Ralph G. Pearson (1983). "Absolute hardness: companion parameter to absolute electronegativity". J. Am. Chem. Soc. 105 (26): 7512 - 7516. doi:10.1021/ja00364a005.
^ The Mechanism of the Reaction of Silver Nitrite with Alkyl Halides. The Contrasting Reactions of Silver and Alkali Metal Salts with Alkyl Halides. The Alkylation of Ambident Anions Nathan Kornblum, Robert A. Smiley, Robert K. Blackwood, Don C. Iffland J. Am. Chem. Soc.; 1955; 77(23); 6269-6280. doi:10.1021/ja01628a064

HSAB theory

Additional recommended knowledge

How to ensure accurate weighing results every day?

Correct Test Weight Handling Guide: 12 Practical Tips

How to quickly check pipettes?

Contents

Theory

Chemical hardness

Kornblum's rule

References

See also

About chemeurope.com

About LUMITOS

Advertise with LUMITOS